How Hackney may succeed where bombers failed

Council sign at 48-76 Dalston Lane © david.altheer@gmail.com
Hackney cllr Vincent Stops 2012 © david.altheer@gmail.com
Stops: Go ahead

THE FATE of the Hackney-owned buildings in Dalston Lane may have been sealed by planning councillors at their latest meeting.

The sub-committee members met on 5 March 2014 to approve the demolish-and-rebuild proposal. Now private contractor Murphy has been told it can call back the bulldozers to complete what they started in January: knocking down the Georgian houses and shops.

In their 200-year history the buildings at 48-76 Dalston Lane E8 3AH have survived Nazi Germany’s Blitz on London in 1940-1941. But within a few weeks Hackney council will have done more damage to the terrace than Hermann Göring’s Luftwaffe, completing a long process of official neglect, incompetence and deception.

A few days after the meeting, members of the council’s Labour majority started a doorknocking campaign to drum up support in the May elections, which gives added relevance to their Dalston Lane decision.

The “vote of shame”, as it has been termed, was split 4-4, so chairman Vincent Stops (Labour, Hackney Central) chose to use his casting vote to clear the way for the bulldozers. With him on that were:

Hackney council-owned Dalston Lane Georgian terrace 140114 © david.altheer@gmail.com
Back in action: bulldozers can get busy on the terrace

* Ann Munn (Labour, Haggerston),

* Brian Bell (Labour, Brownswood),

* Michael Levy (Conservative, Springfield).

Against were:

* Barry Buitekant (Labour,

Susan Fajana-Thomas 2011© david.altheer@gmail.com
Fajana-Thomas: out for count

Haggerston),

* Katie Hanson (Labour, Victoria),

* Abraham Jacobson (Liberal Democrats, Cazenove),

* Linda Smith (Labour, Clissold).

Susan Fajana-Thomas (Labour, Stoke Newington Central) took part in the meeting – but not in the vote. 

A tactic still available to local architectural conservationists is judicial review. Lawyers sometimes work without payment on JRs, which can be expensive but can hold up and sometimes stop projects.

David Altheer 080314

* Backstory: Stop destroying Hackney heritageSinclair’s Olympics vision and Paradiso: Cinema EastEndo

* Emboldened underscored words in most cases indicate a hyperlink, a reader service rare among websites. If a link does not work, it is probably because the site to which the URL refers has not been maintained.

This site welcomes fair comments, including the critical. They may be edited for grammatical, legal or taste reasons, for shortening or for substitution of Wikipedia citations by reliable sources. In the unlikely event that anything defamatory is posted, the sender’s details may have to be divulged, as with any comment/discussion forum under UK law. RSS feed link is at top right. Twitter: @lovingdalston Publicists, amateur and professional, should read http://bit.ly/ZnClKc Also relevant may be the note at the end of http://bit.ly/117GXmi Photographs © David Altheer unless otherwise stated and apart from supplied pictures

One thought on “How Hackney may succeed where bombers failed

  1. Shameful and very regrettable decision, like the approval of the Peacock’s gigantic tower, above Dalston Kingsland Station, near Ridley Road Market. These decisions seem to favour only big contractors. Has Hackney council decided to destroy the character of Dalston?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *