Hackney worries as SW9 road-closure plan falls

* UPDATE 261115: Hackney council has conceded that it should consult on the London Fields road closures and will hold a public meeting in Hackney Town Hall, Mare Street E8 1EA, on Monday 14 December 2015  at 7pm. Showing signs of panic, the council has cancelled previously announced drop-in sessions planned for earlier in the month.

THE CANCELLATION by a Labour council of a road-closure scheme in South London will be bad news for Hackney councillors promoting street closures around London Fields.

Protests by residents and businesses in Brixton led Lambeth council to scrap the Loughborough Road experiment or, in Lambeth-speak, its “vision to improve public areas”. The council says it will reopen the street on wednesday 25 November 2015. Two smaller roads will stay closed.

Objectors claimed the council had not consulted them properly and the London ambulance and fire services criticised the SW9 scheme.

Vauxhall MP Kate Hoey (Labour) said of the U-turn : “The council needs to independently examine how it could have made such a mess of this…

Huge attendance at Queensbridge ward meeting surprised Hackney councillors (supplied pic)

“The cost is huge, not just in money but also in the loss of trust in a local council that doesn’t seem to want to listen to common sense.”

Hackney has shown every sign of ignoring the Labour MP’s advice. Both supporters and opponents of the council’s traffic-filtering experiment, closing streets from January 2016 to through-traffic , will be hoping that changes.

That seems unlikely: Hackney is still resisting pressure to publish details of a survey it commissioned last spring that the council says justifies the closures.

Hamish Scott 221115

* Backstory: Rows erupts over London Fields street closures; How Hackney cashes in on parking 

Main pic: some of the handsome houses bordering London Fields © DavidAltheer[at]gmail.com 

Traffic-filtering, Hackney-style: Got it?
Traffic-filtering, Hackney-style. Got it? Amendments are being made

* Emboldened underscored words in most cases indicate a hyperlink, a reader service rare among websites. If a link does not work, it is probably because the site to which the URL refers has not been maintained.

This site welcomes fair comments, including the critical. They may be edited for grammatical, legal or taste reasons, or for shortening. In the unlikely event that anything defamatory is posted, the sender’s details may have to be divulged. (Under UK law, this applies to any comment/discussion forum, eg, Twitter.) RSS feed link is at top right. Twitter: @lovingdalston Publicists, amateur and professional, should read http://bit.ly/ZnClKc Also relevant may be the note at the end of http://bit.ly/117GXmi Photographs © David Altheer unless otherwise stated and apart from supplied pictures

2 thoughts on “Hackney worries as SW9 road-closure plan falls

  1. An editing error, aka “fat fingers”, led to the irretrievable deletion of a longish comment, which I hope will be resubmitted. – Letters editor

  2. I think this should give confidence to those opposing the scheme that it is not a done deal and that the process is actually quite democratic and will be reversed if not popular.

    Of course we hope supporters of the scheme will outnumber opponents as the benefits of the scheme become evident. We note that though the Lambeth scheme was voted out, other similar schemes north of the river, including ones in Walthamstow and Enfield, have won with significant majorities – 60% – in favour.

    We await the outcome of the De Beauvoir motor-traffic-reduction consultation, which borders the London Fields proposal, with bated breath.

Comments are closed.